Well, I think it is fair to say that this last week has certainly been... dramatic....  

In the midst of all of the chaos, drama, and personnel changes in parliament over the last seven days, you could be forgiven for missing possibly the most important planning story of the week. 

After a period of consideration that managed to encompass a new Monarch, two new Secretaries of State and a grand total of three Housing Ministers*; the Levelling Up & Regeneration Bill is FINALLY out of Committee!

We do not have a date for the report stage as yet. Given the *other* events of yesterday, I suspect that consideration of revised bill by the House of Commons could well be delayed yet again. We have, however, been provided with the amended text.

In the hope that a present might cheer you all up a bit; a comparison report showing the changes made to the bill during committee can be downloaded from the link below.

I have not been through all of the amendments in detail as yet, but I can say that there aren't that many of them - which may not come as a surprise to those of you who have been following the bill's progress. 

It also probably won't come as a surprise to those who read these posts regularly, that I did manage to find the time to take a look at Schedule 11** which deals with the proposed new Infrastructure Levy. 

The more significant amendments to the new Infrastructure Levy (IL) can be broadly summarised as follows:

  • The overall purpose of IL (as set out in s.204A) has been amended to ensure that costs incurred in supporting the development of an area and "achieving any purpose specified under section 204N(5), 204O(3) or 204P(3)" can be funded (wholly or partly) by owners or developers of land in a way that does not make development of the area economically unviable. For completeness, these sections refer to provisions that allow IL to be spent on things that do not meet the definition on "infrastructure" set out in the act
  • We have a newly inserted definition of 'Developer' as a person who can assume liability for IL. This is now defined as "a person who is solely or partly responsible for carrying out a development"
  • Tweaks have been made to the rate setting and examination procedure, to put the examiner under a duty to give reasons for their recommendation, and to allow them to make modifications to proposed charging schedules more easily; and
  • A provision has been included to require councils to account for their IL receipts separately from other monies they have received.

In short, the most significant amendment made to the proposed Infrastructure Levy by the House of Commons' Bills Committee was to make it easier for Councils to use the funds raised for things other than the delivery of infrastructure.

Call me cynical, but surely an Infrastructure Levy that doesn't deliver infrastructure is simply a tax by another name? It certainly isn't a mechanism for guaranteeing the delivery of the new schools, road improvements or health facilities required to support growing communities.

There is certainly plenty for the Commons to debate when LURB enters report stage*!.

Now, we just have to wait to find out who will be leading the Government when it gets there.... 

*and, yes, the resignation of two Prime Ministers - which I believe is a record 

** whilst listening to a planning committee as a) I am that rock and roll, and b) multi-tasking is now a fact of life

*! and even more for the House of Lords to get its teeth stuck into.