The days between Christmas and New Year lend themselves to reflection and prediction. We look back over the year that has just gone and, simultaneously, guess what the year ahead will bring.

I see absolutely no reason to abandon a perfectly good tradition but, being somewhat lazy*, I have left the reflection to others. For those in the mood to review the past twelve months, Planning Resource has done an excellent recap of  the key moments in 2018,  which can be accessed through the link below.  For those who want to see how spectacularly wrong predictions can go;*" this post contains my best impression of a Magic 8 ball.

What we can say, with some certainty, is that we should  be seeing new planning policy and legislation in 2019. MHCLG has promised to release the new housing delivery test in the new year and is consulting on the following proposals, which require new legislation to make it onto the statute books:

  •  Significant changes to current permitted development rights, to allow (amongst other things) greater flexibility of uses on the high street; the demolition of some office buildings and their replacement with new residential developments; and upwards only residential extensions.
  •  Amendments to Compulsory Purchase Powers and changes to the rules which govern local authority land disposals; and
  •  Changes to the CIL Regulations and the rules on how s.106 Agreements can be used to fund infrastructure projects**.

We have also been promised new regulations that will allow Starter Homes to finally get off the ground, and into the housing market, and a number of changes to the Revised National Planning Policy Framework. In particular:

  • clarifications to the revised NPPF's approach to housing land supply - particularly in order to make sure that the standardised approach to housing numbers does not result in fewer houses being required than necessary to meet the Government's target of 300,000 new homes per annum.
  • amending the definition of 'deliverable' within the revised NPPF to make it clear that sites should only be considered 'deliverable' if there is a realistic chance of housing being delivered on site within 5 years; and
  •  amending paragraph 177 of the revised NPPF, in response to the People Over Wind case, to ensure that the presumption in favour of sustainable development is only dis-applied for developments requiring an 'appropriate assessment', in cases where  a suitable mitigation scheme cannot be identified.

We also have some interesting cases winding their way through the Courts, which should keep us all on our toes. Not least the much anticipated judgment in the Friends of the Earth litigation, which could see the revised NPPF declared unlawful due to the Government's failure to carry out a strategic environmental assessment before adopting it*!.

Like a great deal in life right now, precisely how much new planning law appears in 2019 is likely to be highly Brexit-dependent. There will be room for very little else on the parliamentary agenda for a little while at least. That said, the housing crisis is not going away and planning is a favourite football of the political classes - so I suspect that there will be plenty to keep us Planning Nerds busy and blogging in the year ahead. 


* and very aware that I only have so much time before the little one gets bored of watching me type...

*" just ask Michael Fish....

** more details of which can be found in these two blog posts:; and

*! for a handy summary of the arguments on both sides, I recommend the following planning resource article:

*^ Yes, this is another completely gratuitous baby picture. I cannot promise there will not be any more of them - but I can promise that this will be the last one of 2018.....