I fully intend to make up for my spectacularly failure to write a piece last week*, by boring you all with at least two budget related posts before Friday.

Thankfully, unlike last year, it looks as if we may end up with quite a lot to talk about. 

Senior politicians have been hitting the press circuit hard since the end of last week, and it looks as if house-building, and indeed the planning system in general, is going to be in the spotlight again.

The major political parties  now appear to have realised that having a suitable, safe, home is important to people; and as fixing the housing crisis is now being viewed as a bankable vote-winner, the announcements are coming thick and fast. 

Since the middle of last week: 

  •  Theresa May has visited a development site in Barnet to announce that house-building is part of her “personal mission”;
  •  Sajid Javid has threatened to intervene in fifteen local planning authorities, due to their slow progress in getting local plans in place**; 
  • Philip Hammond has committed to a new target of building 300,000 homes a year; and
  • a number of other policy ideas have been floated, from  government-funded remediation of former industrial sites for house building,  to guaranteeing loans by banks to small house builders; and putting in place sanctions for councils who do not get their brownfield registers in place in time.

A lot of these announcements are not, in fact, new.  

The prospect of DCLG intervening in local plan making has been floating around since 2015, although quite how this would work in practice has not been explained***.  Theresa May's commitment to house-building has been the subject of a number of speeches since she first became PM and the idea of loan guarantees and government-funded remediation all appeared in the Housing White Paper, but have yet to make it into an actual (funded) policy.

The commitment to build 300,000 homes a year is ambitious, but it is difficult to see how this can be achieved without either:

  •  a massive release of public sector land for development; or
  •  a re-think of the government's commitment to protecting the green-belt

Neither of these seem particularly likely. The first because it will be expensive and the second because it is seen as political suicide. 

Given that:

  • most of the initiatives in the Housing and Planning Act 2016 have yet to make it onto the statute books in a useable form****, and 
  • much of what is currently being floated will require legislative amendments which may prove tricky for the government right now.  

The cynic in me is inclined to believe that there will be more noise and promise of future reform in the budget than a definitive plan of action, but I guess we only have a few more days left before we find out....

 

* I was a bit distracted by a fairly large-scale regeneration scheme. It is a brilliant project, put forward by an extremely talented group of people, that I hope to be able to brag about shortly. 

** those fifteen authorities being Basildon, Brentwood, Bolsover, Calderdale, Castle Point, Eastleigh, Liverpool, Mansfield, North East Derbyshire, Northumberland, Runnymede, St Albans, Thanet, Wirral and York

*** Simonicity has just published an excellent blog on the history of this idea. The link to which I will put on LinkedIn. 

**** Starter Homes, anyone